Links between Characteristics of Collaborative Peer Video Analysis Events and Literacy Teachers’ Outcomes
Poonam Arya, Wayne State University, United States ; Tanya Christ, Oakland University, United States ; Ming Chiu, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, United States
Journal of Technology and Teacher Education Volume 23, Number 2, ISSN 1059-7069 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA
This study examined how characteristics of Collaborative Peer Video Analysis (CPVA) events are related to teachers’ pedagogical outcomes. Data included 39 transcribed literacy video events, in which 14 in-service teachers engaged in discussions of their video clips. Emergent coding and Statistical Discourse Analysis were used to analyze the data. Findings suggest that particular types of clips (assessment vs. instruction), the purpose for sharing (problems vs. successes), and conversation-turn characteristics—including aspects of pedagogy discussed, aspects of disciplinary knowledge discussed, sources of knowledge, and conversation actions—predicted teachers’ outcomes, such as generation of specific categories of pedagogical ideas and their consideration of applying these ideas in their future literacy pedagogy. Additionally, based on the explanatory model, most of the differences in whether teachers generated ideas or considered applying them in future occurred within a CPVA event (across conversation turns) rather than across events.
Arya, P., Christ, T. & Chiu, M. (2015). Links between Characteristics of Collaborative Peer Video Analysis Events and Literacy Teachers’ Outcomes. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 23(2), 159-183. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved June 2, 2023 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/147290/.
© 2015 Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education
ReferencesView References & Citations Map
- Ball, D. & Cohen, D. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Towards a practice-based theory of professional education. In G.K. Sykes, & L. Darling-hammond, (Eds.), Teaching as learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3-32). San Francisco, Ca: Jossey Bass.
- Boling, E. (2004). Preparing novices for teaching literacy in diverse classrooms: using written, video, and hypermedia cases to prepare literacy teachers. National Reading Conference Yearbook, 53 (pp.130-145). Chicago, iL: national
- Kennedy, P. (2008). A guide to econometrics. Cambridge: Blackwell. Koc, Y., Peker, D., & Osmanoglu, A. (2009). Supporting teacher professional development through online video case study discussions: an assemblage of preservice and inservice teachers and the case teacher. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 1158-1168.
- Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis. Thousand oaks, Ca: sage. Krull, J. & MacKinnon, D. (2001). Multilevel modeling of individual and group level mediated effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 249-277.
- Lave, J. (2004). Stimulating learning in communities of practice. In L.B. Resnick, J.M. Levine, & S.D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognitions (pp. 63-79), Washington, DC: american Psychological association.
- Walkoe, J. (2010). Seeing algebraic thinking in the classroom: a study of teachers’ conceptualization of algebra. In K. Gomez, L. Lyons, and J. Radinsky (Eds.), ICLS 10’ Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, volume 1 (pp. 1055-1062). Chicago, iL: international
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.Suggest Corrections to References
Cited ByView References & Citations Map
Value of Annotated Video-Recorded Lessons as Feedback to Teacher-Candidates
Estella Chizhik & Alexander Chizhik, San Diego State University, United States
Journal of Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 26, No. 4 (2018) pp. 527–552
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact email@example.com.