You are here:

A FEEDBACK MODEL AND SUCCESSFUL E-LEARNING
PROCEEDINGS

, Vanier College & Concordia University, Canada ; , Louisiana State University, United States ; , Vanier College & Concordia University, Canada

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Montreal, Canada ISBN 978-1-880094-46-4 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA

Full Text

Abstract

Based on the literature concerning feedback, self-regulated learning and cooperative learning, this paper discusses a model of effective feedback that can be used to support student learning in computer-mediated environments. The model portrays the learner and teacher/peers as actors who both provide and receive feedback in interlocking loops during learning activities. Findings from two illustrative examples in science and social science classes indicate that while e-learning settings offer the opportunity to enhance feedback during the learning process, effective feedback structures are not automatically a part of interactive simulations, computer-mediated communication or other e-learning settings. Effective feedback in e-learning requires careful design and experimentation.

Citation

Rosenfield, S., Lou, Y. & Dedic, H. (2002). A FEEDBACK MODEL AND SUCCESSFUL E-LEARNING. In M. Driscoll & T. Reeves (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2002--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 1818-1821). Montreal, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved September 29, 2023 from .

© 2002 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Abrami, P.C., Chambers, B., Poulsen, C., De Simone, C., d'Apollonia, S., & Howden, J. (1995). Classroom connections: Understanding and using cooperative learning. Toronto, ONT.: Harcourt -Brace.
  2. Azevedo, R. & Bernard, R. M. (1995). A meta-analysis of the effects of feedback in computer-based instruction, Journal of Educational Computing R esearch, 13, (2), 111-27.
  3. Bangert -Drowns, R. L. Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. T. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events, Review of Educational Research, 61, 213-38.
  4. Butler, D. L, & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis, Review of Educational Research, 65, 245-81.
  5. Dedic, H., Rosenfield, S., Cooper, M., & Fuchs, M. (2001). “Do I really hafta? WebCAL, A look at the use of livemath software in web-based materials that provide interactive engagement in a collaborative learning environment for differential calculus.” Educational Research and Evaluation, 7(2-3), 285-312. S. M. Role the
  6. Latham, A. S. (1997). Learning through feedback. Educational Leadership, 54, P. 86-7.
  7. Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., & D'Apollonia, S. (2001). Small group and individual learning with technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71, 449-521.
  8. Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom conceptual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63, 167-199. Webb, N. M. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 21- 39.
  9. Winne, P.H. (1989). Theories of instruction and of intelligence for designing artificially intelligent tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 24, 229-259.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References