You are here:

Academic Success Factors: An IT Student Perspective
ARTICLE

, , Georgia Southern University, United States

JITE-Research Volume 10, Number 1, ISSN 1539-3585 Publisher: Informing Science Institute

Full Text

Abstract

Numerous studies have identified causal factors for academic success. Factors vary from personal factors, such as cognitive style (McKenzie & Schweitzer, 2001), to social factors, such as culture differences (Aysan, Tanriögen, & Tanriögen, 1996). However, in these studies it is researchers who theorized the causal dimensions and hypothesized the causal factors. Students were passive objects used to test the theories or to validate the hypotheses. Each researcher may have developed his or her own scheme of causal structure. These structures are not necessarily identical among researchers nor are they the same as those of students. This study has two objectives. The first is to combine the factors that contribute to academic success that have been identified in the literature and to unify them under a single framework. This is achieved by reviewing the existing literature on academic uccess and on categorization of academic success factors in order to develop the framework. The second objective is to add the IT student perspective to the framework. That is to find out what factors are perceived by students as relevant to their academic success and to determine which are the most important. To this end, two surveys were administered to IT students. In the first survey, students identified causal factors related to their own academic success. In the second survey, students ranked factors according to importance. Students did not list any factors that had been previously presented in research. However, they did identify them at a more detailed level (for example, literature might look at effort as a factor, where students listed several activities that involve effort). However, students did not list some factors as important to their success that had been previously identified in the literature, most notably intelligence. The detailed results for the two surveys are presented and discussed. Recommendations are made for institutions and faculty based on the results obtained.

Citation

Zhang, A. & Aasheim, C. (2011). Academic Success Factors: An IT Student Perspective. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 10(1), 309-331. Informing Science Institute. Retrieved August 12, 2022 from .

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Aasheim, C.L., Williams, S., & Butler, E.S. (2009). Knowledge and skill requirements for IT graduates: A survey of it workers and managers. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 42, 690-699.
  2. Anderson, E.S., & Keith, T.Z. (1997). A longitudinal test of a model of academic success for at-risk high school students. Journal of Educational Research, 90(5), 259-268.
  3. Aysan, F., Tanrıöğen, G., & Tanrıöğen, A. (1996). Perceived causes of academic failure among the students at the faculty of education at Buca. U.S. Department of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED406326)
  4. Blumberg, P. (1984). Predicting student success from non-cognitive variables. Paper presented at the 1984 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED243970)
  5. Boekaerts, M., Otten, R., & Voeten, R. (2003). Examination performance: Are student's causal attributions school-subject specific? Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 16(3), 331-342.
  6. Bok, D. (1992). Reclaiming the public trust. Change, 24(4), 12-19.
  7. Bowman, L.J. (2005). Grade retention: Is it a help or hindrance to student academic success? PreventingSchool Failure, 49(3), 42-46.
  8. Brookshire, R.G., Crews, T.B., & Brown, H.F., III. (2009). Student success in a university introductory networks and telecommunications course: Contributing factors. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 5(1), 53-61.
  9. Bruinsma, M., & Jansen, E. (2007). Educational productivity in higher education: An examination of part of the Walberg educational productivity model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 18(1), 45-65.
  10. Cherniss, C., & Goleman D. (2001). The emotionally intelligent workplace: How to select for, measure, and improve emotional intelligence in individuals, groups, and organizations. CA: Jossey-Bass.
  11. Connolly, J., & McGrail, J. (1978). School variables affecting student learning. National Institute of Education, Washington, DC. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED179555)
  12. Costrell, R., Hanushek, E., & Loeb, S. (2008). What do cost functions tell us about the cost of an adequate education? Peabody Journal of Education, 83(2), 198-223.
  13. Daniels, E., & Arapostathis, M. (2005). What do they really want? Student voices and motivation research. Urban Education, 40(1), 34-59.
  14. Demeulemeester, J., & Rochat, D. (1995). Impact of individual characteristics and sociocultural environment on academic success. International Advances in Economic Research, 1(3), 278-288.
  15. Deniz, M.E., Tras, Z., & Aydogan, D. (2009). An investigation of academic procrastination, locus of control, and emotional intelligence. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 9(2), 623-632.
  16. Denton, J.J., Morris, J.E., & Tooke, D. (1981). Academic characteristics of student teachers and cognitive attainment of their learners. Paper prepared for the Annual Meeting of the Association of Teacher Educators. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED199195) Academic Success Factors
  17. Dweck, C.S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040– 1048.
  18. Ehrenberg, R., Brewer, D., Gamoran, A., & Willms, J. (2001). Class size and student achievement. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2(1), 1-30.
  19. Emerson, R.M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27(1), 31-41.
  20. Feick, D., & Rhodewalt, F. (1997). The double-edged sword of self-handicapping: Discounting, augmentation, and the protection and enhancement of self-esteem. Motivation and Emotion, 21(2), 147-163.
  21. Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. New York, NY: Bantam Books.
  22. Gomez, E., Wu, D., & Passerini, K. (2010). Computer-supported team-based learning: The impact of motivation, enjoyment and team contributions on learning outcomes. Computers & Education, 55(1), 378390.
  23. Gradstein, M., & Justman, M. (2000). Human capital, social capital, and public schooling. European Economic Review, 44(4-6), 879-890.
  24. Greenwald, R., Hedges, L., & Laine, R. (1996). The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 66(3), 361-396.
  25. Grossman, M. (2008). The relationship between health and schooling. Eastern Economic Journal, 34(3), 281-292.
  26. Hanushek, E.A. (1996). A more complete picture of school resource policies. Review of Educational Research, 66(3), 397-409.
  27. Hanushek, E.A., & Kimko, D. (2000). Schooling, labor force quality, and the growth of nations. American Economic Review, 90(5), 1184–1208.
  28. Hanushek, E.A., & Raymond, M.F. (2005). Does school accountability lead to improved student performance? Journal of Policy Analysis & Management, 24(2), 297-327.
  29. Hanushek, E.A., & Wößmann, L. (2006). Does educational tracking affect performance and inequality? Differences-in-differences evidence across countries. Economic Journal, 116(510), C63-C76.
  30. Harris, D. (1940). Factors affecting college grades: a review of the literature, 1930–1937. Psychological Bulletin, 37(3), 125–166.
  31. Haskell, R.E. (1998). Academic freedom, tenure, and student evaluation of faculty: Galloping polls in the 21st century. ERIC/AE Digest. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED426114)
  32. Henry, J., Martinko, M., & Pierce, M. (1993). Attributional style as a predictor of success in a first computer science course. Computers in Human Behavior, 9(4), 341-352.
  33. Howard, R.D., Borland, K., Johnson, C., & Baker, L.J. (2001). Academic success of suspended students. AIR 2001 Annual Forum, 2-19.
  34. Hulse, J.A., Chenowith, T., Lebedovych, L., Dickinson, P., Cavanaugh, B., & Garrett, N. (2007). Predictors of student success in the U.S. Army graduate program in anesthesia nursing. AANA Journal, 75(5), 339-346.
  35. Kinshuk, T., & McNab, P. (2006). Cognitive trait modeling: the case of inductive reasoning ability. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 43(2), 151-161.
  36. Lackaye, T.D., & Margalit, M. (2006). Comparisons of achievement, effort, and self-perceptions among students with learning disabilities and their peers from different achievement groups. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 3(5), 432-446.
  37. Massy, W.F., & Wilger, A. (1995). Improving productivity: What faculty think about it and its effect on quality. Change, 27(4), 10-21.
  38. Mathews, J.G., & Hackett, E.R. (1997, November). The Alabama superintendent's report card: An analysis of local education agency characteristics and success at meeting state defined performance measures. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED415254)
  39. Matuszek, P. & Haskin, C. (1978). Who are the disadvantaged and what should we do for them? The relationship of family variables to achievement and some implications for educational programming. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED171438)
  40. Mayer, M.J. & Patriarca, L.A. (2007). Behavioral scripts and instructional procedures for students with learning and behavioral problems. Preventing School Failure, 52(1), 3-12.
  41. McGregor, A. (2007). Academic success, clinical failure: Struggling practices of a failing student. Journal of Nursing Education, 46(11), 504-515.
  42. McKenzie, K., & Schweitzer, R. (2001). Who succeeds at university? Factors predicting academic performance in first year Australian university students. Higher Education Research and Development, 20(1), 21-33.
  43. Mehrabian, A. (1968). Male and female scales of the tendency to achieve. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 28(2), 493-502.
  44. Melby, J.N., & Conger, R.D. (1996). Parental behaviors and adolescent academic performance: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 6(1), 113-37.
  45. Meyer, J., & Koelbl, S. (1982). Students' test performances: Dimensionality of causal attributions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8(1), 31-36.
  46. Michaelsen, L.K., Knight, A.B., & Fink, L.D. (2002). Team-based learning: A transformative use of small groups. London: Praeger Publishers.
  47. Mixon, F.G., & Treviño, L.J. (2005). From kickoff to commencement: The positive role of intercollegiate athletics in higher education. Economics of Education Review, 24(1), 97-102.
  48. Niemczyk, M.C., & Savenye, W.C. (2001). The relationship of student motivation and self-regulated learning strategies to performance in an undergraduate computer literacy course. Proceedings of the 24th National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 312322.
  49. Nonis, S.A. & Hudson, G.I. (2010). Performance of college students: Impact of study time and study habits. Journal of Education for Business, 85, 229-238.
  50. President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2007). Leadership under challenge: Information technology R & D in a competitive world. Retrieved from http://www.nitrd.gov/pcast/reports/PCAST-NIT-FINAL.pdf
  51. Ritchey, F., & Lewis, B. (1986). A statistical interaction model for examining compensatory effects on academic performance. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED310164)
  52. Roberts, G., & Pascuzzi, D. (1979). Causal attributions in sport: some theoretical implications. Journal of Sport Psychology, 1(3), 203-210.
  53. Academic Success FactorsRoss, J., Drysdale, M., & Schulz, R. (2001). Cognitive learning styles and academic performance in two postsecondary computer application courses. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(4), 400-412.
  54. Rotter, J.B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. NY: Prentice-Hall.
  55. Schoeneman, T., & Curry, S. (1990). Attributions for successful and unsuccessful health behavior change. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 11(4), 421-431.
  56. Seay, C. (2004). Using a "socio-cultural" approach in teaching information technology to African American students with academic difficulties. Journal of Information Technology Education, 3, 83-102. Retrieved from http://www.jite.org/documents/Vol3/v3p083-102-103.pdf
  57. Shelton, E. (2003). Faculty support and student retention. Journal of Nursing Education, 42(2), 68-76.
  58. Spector, P.E. (1983). Locus of control and social influence susceptibility: Are externals normative or informational conformers? Journal of Psychology, 115(2), 199-201.
  59. Sutton, T., & Bergerson, P. (2001). Faculty compensation systems: Impact on the quality of higher education. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 28(2), 15-24.
  60. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  61. Volkwein, J.F., Valle, S., Parmley, K., Blose, G., & Zhou, Y. (2000). A multi-campus study of academic performance and cognitive growth among native freshman, two-year transfers, and four-year transfers. Paper presented at the Annual Forum for Institutional Research. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED445652)
  62. Weber, R. (1985). Basic content analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
  63. Weiner, B. (1974). Achievement motivation and attribution theory. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
  64. Weiner, B. (1979). A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(1), 3-25.
  65. Weller, L.D. (1984). Attitude toward grade inflation: A survey of private and public colleges of education. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 18(1), 51-56.
  66. Wince, M.H., & Borden, V. (1995). When does student satisfaction matter? Paper presented at the Annual Forum for Institutional Research. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED386990)
  67. Yan, W., & Gaier, E. (1994). Causal attributions for college success and failure: An Asian-American comparison. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25(1), 146-158.
  68. Zangenehzadeh, H. (1988). Grade inflation: A way out. Journal of Economic Education, 19(3), 217-26.
  69. Zhang, Z., & RiCharde, R. (1997). Learning-thinking style inventory: LISREL and multivariate analyses. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED410264) Zhang & Aasheim Biographies

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Links