You are here:

Evaluating Educational Websites: A System for Multiple Websites at Multiple Universities
PROCEEDINGS

, , The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Lugano, Switzerland ISBN 978-1-880094-53-2 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Full Text

Abstract

The paper presents a strategy for systematic evaluation of 30 teacher-designed course websites in the year 2003, built under the project e3Learning which operates across three universities in Hong Kong. Because of the diversified nature of the websites, the evaluation system is designed to be able to facilitate tailor-made evaluation plans so that the evaluation data generated 1) allow in-depth understanding of the different types of course websites concerned, 2) provide the types of feedback the teachers request about their students' eLearning experience, and 3) enable the project team to better understand the nature of eLearning and thus provide better educational advice.

Citation

Lam, P. & McNaught, C. (2004). Evaluating Educational Websites: A System for Multiple Websites at Multiple Universities. In L. Cantoni & C. McLoughlin (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2004--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 1066-1073). Lugano, Switzerland: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved June 9, 2023 from .

© 2004 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Alexander, S., & Hedberg, J. (1994). Evaluating technology -based learning: Which model? In K. Beattie, C. McNaught & S. Wills (Eds). Multimedia in higher education: Designing for change in teaching and learning, pp. 233-244. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  2. Ash, C. (2000). Towards a new cost-aware evaluation framework. Educational Technology & Socie ty 3(4), 126-131. Bain, J. D. (1999). Introduction. Special issue: Learning- centred evaluation of innovation in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 18(2), 165-172.
  3. Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2001). The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R- SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133-149
  4. Guba, E. G., & Lincioln, Y. S. (1981). Effective evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey -Bass Publishers.
  5. James, J., McNaught, C., Csete, J., Hodgson, P., & Vogel, D. (2003). From MegaWeb to e3Learning: A model of support for university academics to effectively use the Web for teaching and learning. In D. Lassner & C. McNaught (Eds). ED - MEDIA 2003, Proceedings of the 15th annual World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, pp. 3303-3310, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 23-28 June. Norfolk VA: Association for the Advancement of Computers in Education.
  6. Learning Technology Dissemination Initiative. (1998). Evaluation cookbook. Retrieved on 30 April 2004 from http://www.icbl.hw.ac.uk/ltdi/cookbook/contents.html
  7. McNaught, C. (2002). Adopting technology should mean adapting it to meet learning needs. On The Horizon, 10(4), 14-18. Oliver, M., McBean, J., Conole, G. & Harvey, J., (2002). Using a toolkit to support the evaluation of learning. Journal of Computer Assis ted Learning, 18, 199-208.
  8. Williams, P. (2002). The learning Web: The development, implementation and evaluation of internet -based undergraduate materials for the teaching of key skills. Active Learning in Higher Education 3(1), 40-53.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Also Read

Related Collections