You are here:

Using Personal Mobile Devices to increase flexibility and equity in learning in resource constrained contexts.
ARTICLE

,

Journal of Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning Volume 22, Number 2, ISSN 1179-7665 e-ISSN 1179-7665 Publisher: Distance Education Association of New Zealand

Full Text

Abstract

This paper examines how in a resource constrained context, access to personal mobile devices for first year university students increases their flexibility of learning and creates a environment of greater inclusivity at University. In 2016, at the start of their first year 201 students in an extended degree program in the Humanities at the University of Cape Town were surveyed about their access to Personal Mobile Devices (PMDs). Based on need, 68 students were given an entry level tablet to use as their own for the duration of their studies. As a consequence of establishing a learning context where students all had access to a PMD the lecturers could engage students in multimodal blended learning and teaching approach. This paper draws on data in the form of student surveys and focus groups and explores not only the challenges and opportunities for students in using PMDs for their learning both in and out of the classroom but the flexibility of learning enabled through PMDs. The study shows that creating an equitable context in terms of physical access to digital technology enables students’ learning but also presents some new challenges.

Citation

Brown, C. & Haupt, G. (2018). Using Personal Mobile Devices to increase flexibility and equity in learning in resource constrained contexts. Journal of Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning, 22(2), 18-31. Distance Education Association of New Zealand. Retrieved March 22, 2023 from .

This record was imported from the Journal of Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning on December 19, 2018. [Original Record]

The Journal of Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning is a publication of New Zealand Association for Open, Flexible and Distance Learning (DEANZ).

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Barbour, I. (2014). Sketchnotes from a talk by Mary Lea, “Digital literacies: Exploring textual practices in a digital higher education” [Graphic]. The assignment sandwich. Retrieved from http://barbourians.org/2014/11/20/assignment-sandwich/
  2. Bozalek, V., Gachago, D., Alexander, L., Watters, K., Wood, D., Ivala, E., & Herrington, J.(2013). The use of emerging technologies for authentic learning: A South African study in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44, 629–638.
  3. Bozalek, V., & Ng’ami, D. (2015). The context of learning with technologies. In W.R. Kilfoil(Ed.), Moving beyond the hype: A contextualised view of learning with technology in higher education. Pretoria: Universities South Africa.
  4. Broekman, I., Enslin, P., & Pendlebury, S. (2002). Distributive justice and information communication technologies in higher education in South Africa. South African Journal of Higher Education, 16, 29–35.
  5. Brown, C. (2014). Investigation into enabling conditions to optimise the use of personal mobile devices (PMDs) in teaching and learning in higher education institutions in South Africa: Proposal to Collaborative Teaching Development Grant Program. Department of Higher Education and Training (DHET), South Africa.
  6. Brown, C., Haupt, G., & Hunma, A. (2018). Mainstreaming mobile teaching innovation in a resource constrained context: Changing access—shifting practice. In H. Crompton& J.
  7. Czerniewicz, L. (2015). Considering inequality as higher education goes online. [Presentation slides]. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/laura_Cz/inequality-as-higher-ed-goesonline.
  8. Czerniewicz, L., & Brown, C. (2009). A study of the relationship between institutional policy,organisational culture and e-learning use in four South African universities. Computers and Education, 53(1), 121–131.
  9. Czerniewicz, L., & Rother, K. (2018). Institutional educational technology policy and strategy documents: An inequality gaze. Research in Comparative and International Education, 13(1),pp. 27–45.
  10. Dabbagh, N., & Fake, H. (2017). College students’ perceptions of personal learning environments through the lens of digital tools, processes and spaces. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research 6(1): 28–36. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10045/61713
  11. Davis, S., Mullan, J., & Feldman, P. (2017). Rebooting learning for the digital age: What next for technology-enhanced higher education? Retrieved from https://www.hepi.ac.uk/wpcontent/uploads/2017/02/Hepi_Rebooting-learning-for-the-digital-age-Report-9320_01_17Web.pdf
  12. Department of Education. (2004). White paper on e-education: Transforming learning and teaching through information and communication technologies (ICTs). Retrieved from https://www.education.gov.za/Portals/0/Documents/Legislation/White%20paper/DoE%20Whi te%20Paper%207.pdf?ver=2008-03-05-111708-000
  13. EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative (ELI). (2015). 7 things you should know about personal learning environments (PLE). Retrieved from https://library.educause.edu/resources/2015/9/7things-you-should-know-about-personalized-learning
  14. Edwards, M.R., & Clinton, M.E. (2018). A study exploring the impact of lecture capture availability and lecture capture usage on student attendance and attainment. Higher Education. Retrieved from
  15. Goyanes, M., & Catalán-Matamoros, D. (2017). Ubiquitous laptop use in higher education: Multitasking and students’ perception of distraction in a European setting. First Monday,22(10). Retrieved from http://uncommonculture.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/7268/6548
  16. Hämäläinen, R., Kiili, C., & Smith, B.E. (2016). Orchestrating 21st century learning in higher education: A perspective on student voice. British Journal of Educational Technology 48(5),1106–1118.
  17. Hartnett, M. (2017). Differences in the digital home lives of young people in New Zealand. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 642–652.
  18. Internet World Stats. (2016). Internet world stats: Usage and population statistics. New Zealand. Retrieved from https://www.internetworldstats.com/sp/nz.htm
  19. Internet World Stats. (2016). Internet world stats: Usage and population statistics. South Africa. Retrieved from https://www.internetworldstats.com/af/za.htm
  20. JISC. (2017). Student digital experience tracker: Insights from institutional pilots. Retrieved from http://repository.jisc.ac.uk/6671/1/Tracker2017insights.pdf
  21. Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V. & Freeman, A. (2015). NMC Horizon report: 2015 higher education edition. Austin, Texas. The New Media Consortium.
  22. Kilfoil, W.R. (2015). Preface. In W.R. Kilfoil, (Ed.), Moving beyond the hype: A contextualised view of learning with technology in higher education. Pretoria: Universities South Africa, pp.1–2.
  23. Lea, M. (2013). Academic literacies in the digital university: Integrating individual accounts with network practice. In R.A.L. Goodfellow, M. (Ed.), Literacy in the digital university (pp. 137–
  24. Newman, T., & Beetham, H. (2017). Student digital experience tracker 2017: The voice of 22,000 UK learners. Retrieved from http://repository.jisc.ac.uk/6662/1/Jiscdigitalstudenttracker2017.pdf
  25. OECD. (2018). Income inequality. Retrieved from https://data.oecd.org/inequality/incomeinequality.htm
  26. Van Rooyen, C., & Marias, I.E. (2018). A socially just pedagogy in the use of mobile devices in higher education? The case of Humanities first-year students at a South African university.
  27. We are Social Singapore. (2017). Digital in 2017: Australia, New Zealand and the Pacific.[Presentation slides]. Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/wearesocialsg/digital-in-2017-australia-new-zealandthe-pacific
  28. We are Social Singapore. (2017). Digital in 2017: Southern Africa. [Presentation slides]. Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/wearesocialsg/digital-in-2017-southern-africa
  29. World Bank. (2016). Individuals using the internet(% of population). Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IT.NET.USER.ZS
  30. Brown, C., & Haupt, G. (2018). Using personal mobile devices to increase flexibility and equity in learning in resource-constrained contexts. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 22(13), [18–31.]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read

Related Collections