
Evaluating LMS Usability for Enhanced eLearning Experience
PROCEEDINGS
Alessandro Inversini, Luca Botturi, Luca Triacca, USI, University of Lugano, Switzerland
EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Orlando, FL USA ISBN 978-1-880094-60-0 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC
Abstract
This paper reports the method and results of a comparative usability study conducted on four Learning Management Systems (LMS), two commercial and two Open Source. The results suggest that there is no single most usable LMS, and that there is no significant difference in the usability of commercial vs. Open Source applications for eLearning. Finally, the paper proposes some simple workarounds that teachers and instructional developers can exploit in order to fix some LMS usability problems in student interface.
Citation
Inversini, A., Botturi, L. & Triacca, L. (2006). Evaluating LMS Usability for Enhanced eLearning Experience. In E. Pearson & P. Bohman (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2006--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 595-601). Orlando, FL USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved May 30, 2023 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/23070/.
© 2006 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Armani, J., Botturi, L., Cantoni, I., DiBenedetto, M., & Garzotto, F. (2004). Integrating Instructional Design and Hypermedia Design. Proceedings of EDMEDIA 2004 (1), Lugano, Switzerland, 1713-1719.
- Bolchini, D., Cantoni, L., & Di Blas, N. (2003). Comunicazione, qualità, usabilità. Milano: Apogeo. Bolchini D., Triacca L. Speroni, M. (2003). MiLE: a reuse-oriented usability evaluation method for the web. HCI International Conference, Crete, Greece.
- Botturil, L. (2004). Functional Assessment of some Open Source LMS. ELab technical report.
- Brinck, T., Gergle, D., & Wood, S.D. (2002). Usability for the web. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
- Carroll, J. (2002). Making Use-Scenario-based Design of Human-Computer Interactions. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Cato, J. (2001). User-Centered Web Design. MA: Addison Wesley. Claroline (N.D.). Worldwide. Retrieved on December, 7th 2005, from http://www.claroline.net/worldwide.htm.
- Donahue, G.M, Weinschenk, S., & Nowicki, J. (1999). Usability Is Good Business. Compuware Corporation Report. Edutools (N.D.), Edutools. Reviewed on November 27th, 2005, from http://www.edutools.info/ FNL (N.D.), Forum New Learning. Reviewed on November 27th, 2005, from https://fnl.ch/default.aspx
- Frick, T., Elder, M., Hebb, C., Wang Y., Yoon S. (2005). Adaptive Usability Evaluation of Complex WebSites: How Many Tasks?. Paper presented at the AECT Convention 2005, Orlando, FL, USA.
- González-Barahona, J.M., & Robles, G. (2003). Free Software Engineering: A Field to Explore. Upgrade, 4(4), 49-54.
- ISO (1998). ISO 9241-11:1998. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)-Part 11: Guidance on usability. International Organization for Standardization.
- Lepori, B., Cantoni, L., & Rezzonico, S. (2005). EDUM eLearning Manual. Lugano: NewMinE Lab. Retrieved online on December 6th, 2005, from http://www.newmine.org/index/library/epapers.htm
- Nielsen, J. (2000). Designing Web Usability. Indianapolis, IN: New Riders Publishing.
- Nielsen, J., & Mack, R. (1994). Usability Inspection Methods. New York, NY, USA: J. Wiley& Sons. Nielsen J., (2003), Return on Investment for Usability. Retrived on December 14th, 2005, http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20030107.html [Alertbox].
- Pulichino, J. (2004). Usability and e-learning, The E-learning Guild Survey series, January 2004.
- Raymond, E.S. (2000). The Cathedral and the Bazar. Retrieved online on November 25th 2005, from http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/ Rubin, J. (1994). Handbook of Usability Testing: How to Plan, Design, and Conduct Effective Tests. New York, John Wiley.
- Triacca, L., Bolchini, D., Botturi, L., & Inversioni, A. (2004). MiLE: Systematic Usability Evaluation for E-learning Web Applications. Proceedings of EDMEDIA 2004, Lugano, Switzerland, 4398-4405.
- Triacca, L., Bolchini, D., Di Blas, N., & Paolini, P. (2003). Wish you were Usable! How to improve the Quality of a Museum WebSite. International Conference on Electronic Imaging and the Visual Arts (EVA03), Florence, Italy.
- Triacca, L., Inversini, A., & Bolchini, D. (2005). Evaluating Web Usability with MiLE+. WebSite Evolution IEEE Symposium, Budapest : Hungary.
- Whiteside, J., Bennet, J., & Holtzblatt, K. (1988). Usability engineering: Our experience and evolution. In M. Helander (Ed.), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, Amsterdam, NL: Elsevier (pp. 791-817).
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to ReferencesCited By
View References & Citations Map-
Investigating and Comparing User Experiences of Course Management Systems: BlackBoard vs. Moodle
Zafer Unal, USF St. Petersburg, United States; Aslihan Unal, Florida State University, United States
Journal of Interactive Learning Research Vol. 25, No. 1 (January 2014) pp. 101–123
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.