You are here:

The Effects of Spatial Visualization Ability and Graphical Navigational Aids on Cognitive Load and Learning from Web-Based Instruction
Article

, University of Washington, United States

Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia Volume 18, Number 1, ISSN 1055-8896 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

This study contributes to research investigating the effects of individual differences and online instructional design on learning. Learning performance was compared across three hypertext formats incorporating different navigational aids. The hierarchical map represented the physical structure of the hypertext in one condition, while the network map represented the semantic structure of the hypertext in another condition, and the control group received no map. It was hypothesized that an interaction would be observed between the learners ability to visualize the hypertext structure and the explicit graphical representation of that structure, such that larger differences in knowledge acquisition and disorientation would be found among learners with low visualization ability. The analysis also accounted for individual differences like the need for cognition, prior knowledge, and time on task. The results suggest that the cognitive load associated with orientation within hypertext may be ameliorated by providing a comprehensive hierarchical map to serve as navigational aid for the structure of hypertext content, as opposed to providing a non-hierarchical semantic map or no navigational aid. Despite the differences in disorientation, no significant effect of the hypertext format on learning performance was observed. A discussion of the findings includes considerations of methodological aspects of the study.

Citation

Morozov, A. (2009). The Effects of Spatial Visualization Ability and Graphical Navigational Aids on Cognitive Load and Learning from Web-Based Instruction. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 18(1), 27-70. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved June 9, 2023 from .

© 2009 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Boechler, P.M. (2001). How spatial is hyperspace? Interacting with hypertext documents: Cognitive processes and concepts. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 4(1), 23-46.
  2. Brunken, R., Plass, J.L., & Leutner, D. (2003). Direct measurement of cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 53-61.
  3. Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E., & Kao, C.F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306-307.
  4. Campagnoni, F.R., & Ehrlich, K. (1989). Information retrieval using a hypertext-based help system. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 7(3), 271-291.
  5. Carroll, J.B. (1974). Psychometric tests as cognitive tasks: A new structure of intellect. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
  6. Chen, C. (2000). Individual differences in a spatial-semantic virtual environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(6), 529542.
  7. Chen, C.M., & Rada, R. (1996). Interacting with hypertext: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Human-Computer Interaction, 11(2), 125-156.
  8. Conklin, J. (1987). Hypertext: An introduction and survey. IEEE Computer, 20(9), 17-41.
  9. Curl, S.S., Olfman, L., & Satzinger, J.W. (1998). An investigation of the roles of individual differences and user interface on database usability, ACM SIGMIS Database, 29(1), 50-65.
  10. Dillon, A., & Gabbard, R. (1998). Hypermedia as an educational technology: A review of the quantitative research literature on learner comprehension, control, and style. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 322-349.
  11. Downing, R.E., Moore, J.L., & Brown, S.W. (2005). The effects and interaction of spatial visualization and domain expertise on information seeking. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 195–209.
  12. Duffy, T.M., & Knuth, R. (1990). Hypermedia and instruction: Where is the match? In Jonassen, D.H. & Mandl, H. (Eds.). Designing Hypermedia for Learning. NATO ASI Series. Series F, Computer and Systems Sciences, 67, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  13. Eckstrom, R.B., French, J.W., Harman, H.H., & Derman, D. (1976). Kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
  14. Eveland, W.P., Cortese, J., Park, H., & Dunwoody, S. (2004). How website organization influences free recall, factual knowledge, and knowledge structure density. Human Communication Research, 30(2), 208-233.
  15. Eveland, W.P., & Dunwoody, S. (2000). Examining information processing on the 68 Morozov
  16. Eveland, W.P., & Dunwoody, S. (2001). User control and structural isomorphism or disorientation and cognitive load? Learning from the Web versus print. Communication Research, 28(1), 48-78.
  17. Hede, A. (2002). An integrated model of multimedia effects on learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 11(2), 177-91.
  18. Jonassen, D.H. (1988). Designing Structured Hypertext and Structuring Access to Hypertext. Educational Technology, 28(11), 13-16.
  19. Jonassen, D.H., Beissner, K., & Yacci, M.A. (1993). Structural knowledge: Techniques for representing, conveying and acquiring structural knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  20. Jonassen, D.H., & Mandl, H. (Eds.) (1990). Designing hypermedia for learning. NATO ASI Series. Series F, Computer and Systems Sciences, 67, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  21. Jonassen, D.H., & Wang, S. (1993). Acquiring structural knowledge from semantically structured hypertext. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 20(1), 1-8.
  22. Khalifa, M. (1998). Effects of Hypertext on Knowledge Construction. ThirtyFirst Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1, 294300.
  23. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163-182.
  24. Kirschner, P.A. (2002). Cognitive load theory: Implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning. Learning and Instruction, 12, 1-10.
  25. Lang, A. (2000). The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of Communication, 50(1), 46-70.
  26. Lee, M.J., & Tedder, M.C. (2004). Introducing expanding hypertext based on working memory capacity and the feeling of disorientation: Tailored communication through effective hypertext design. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 19(3), 171-195.
  27. Leung, A.C.K. (2003). Providing navigation aids and online learning helps to support user control: A conceptual model on computer-based learning. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 43(3), 10-17.
  28. Macedo-Rouet, M., Rouet, J.-F., Epstein, I., & Fayard, P. (2003). Effects of online reading on popular science comprehension. Science Communication, 25(2), 99-128.
  29. Mayer, R.E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  30. McKnight, C. (1996). What makes a good hypertext? In van Oostendorp, H. & De Mul, S. (Eds.). Cognitive aspects of electronic text processing. (pp. 213239).
  31. Mohageg, M.F. (1992). The influence of hypertext linking structures on the efficiency of information-retrieval. Human Factors, 34(3), 351-367.
  32. Moore, T. (1995). Active use of hypertext to aid learning and classroom instruction. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, Proceedings of the twenty-sixth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, 27(1), 297-301.
  33. Nelson, T. (1967). Getting it out of our system. In Schlechter, G. (Ed.) Information Retrieval: A Critical Review. Washington D.C.: Thompson Books.
  34. Niederhauser, D.S., Reynolds, R.E., Salmen, D.J., & Skolmoski, P. (2000). The influence of cognitive load on learning from hypertext. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(3), 237-255.
  35. O’Donnell, A.M., Dansereau, D.F., & Hall, R.H. (2002). Knowledge maps as scaffolds for cognitive processing. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 71-86.
  36. Paas, F., Tuovinen, J.E., Tabbers, H., & Van Gerven, P.W.M. (2003). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 63-71.
  37. Plass, J.L., Chun, D.M., Mayer, R.E., & Leutner, D. (2003). Cognitive load in reading aforeign language text with multimedia aids and the influence of verbal and spatial abilities. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 221–243.
  38. Potelle. H., & Rouet, J.-F. (2003). Effects of content representation and readers’ prior knowledge on the comprehension of hypertext. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58(3), 327-345.
  39. Puntambekar, S., Stylianou, A., & Hübscher, R. (2003). Improving navigation and learning in hypertext environments with navigable concept maps. Human-Computer Interaction, 18(4), 395-428.
  40. Reynolds, S.B., & Dansereau, D.F. (1990). The knowledge hypermap – An alternative to hypertext. Computers& Education, 14(5), 409-416.
  41. Rogers, P.L. (2002). Designing instruction for technology-enhanced learning. Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.
  42. Shapiro, A.M. (1998). Promoting active learning: The role of system structure in learning from hypertext. Human-Computer Interaction, 13(1), 1-35.
  43. Shapiro, A.M. (1999). The relevance of hierarchies to learning biology from hypertext.Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(2), 215-243.
  44. Shin, E.C., Schallert, D.L., & Savenye, W.C. (1994). Effects of learner control, advisement, and prior knowledge on young students learning in a hypertext environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(1), 33-46.
  45. Stanney, K.M., & Salvendy, G. (1995). Information visualization: Assisting low spatial individuals with information access tasks through the use of visual mediators. Ergonomics, 38(6), 1184–1198.
  46. Stanton, N., Correia, A.P., & Dias, P. (2000). Efficacy of a map on search, orientation and access behaviour in a hypermedia system. Computers& Education, 70 Morozov
  47. Swartout, W.R., & Smoliar, S. (1987). On making expert systems more like experts. ExpertSystems, 4, 196-207. Sweller, J. (1999.) Instructional design in technical areas. Camberwell: The Australian Council for Educational Research Ltd.
  48. Tomek, I., Khan, S., Muldner, T., Nassar, M., Novak, G., & Proszynski, P. (1991). Hypermedia-introduction and survey. Journal of Microcomputer Applications, 14(2), 63-103.
  49. Tremayne, M., & Dunwoody, S. (2001). Interactivity, information processing, and learning on the WorldWide Web. Science Communication, 23(2), 111134.
  50. Van Dijk, T. (1980). Macrostructures: An interdisciplinary study of global structures in discourse, interaction, and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  51. Vicente, K., Hayes, B., & Williges, R. (1987). Assaying and isolating individual differences in searching a hierarchical file system. Human Factors, 29(3), 349–359.
  52. Westerman, S.J., Davies, D.R., Glendon, A.I., Stammers, R.B., & Matthews, G. (1995). Age and cognitive ability as predictors of computerized information retrieval. Behaviour& Information Technology, 14, 313-326.
  53. Wickens, C.D. (1992). Engineering psychology and human performance. (2nd ed.) New York: Harper Collins.
  54. Wittrock, M.C. (1974). Learning as a generative process. Educational Psychologist, 11, 87-95.
  55. Zhang, H., & Salvendy, G. (2001). The implications of visualization ability and structure preview design for web information search tasks. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 13(1), 75-95.
  56. Zumbach, J., & Reimann, P. (2002). Enhancing learning from hypertext by inducing a goal orientation: Comparing different approaches. Instructional Science, 30(4), 243-267.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read

Related Collections