You are here:

Pen Casting in a Teacher Education Program
PROCEEDINGS

, , Georgian Court University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in New Orleans, Louisiana, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-02-5 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

Abstract: This study examined the use of a recording tool as a way to develop reflective practice of teacher candidates (n=16), who recorded a portion of their lesson plan content for future dissemination to K-12 students. Descriptive and frequency statistics were used to examine participant pretest/posttest data. Findings indicate that candidates recorded pen casts an average of 2.68 times, indicating metacognition was activated as they paid attention to the pen cast upon replay, identified areas for improvement, performed those improvements, and were concerned about the accuracy of information. Candidates offered their perspectives on the use of the tool and K-12 students and their parents provided commentary about this form of content delivery.

Citation

Sardone, N. & Cordasco, B. (2013). Pen Casting in a Teacher Education Program. In R. McBride & M. Searson (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2013--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 4044-4051). New Orleans, Louisiana, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 27, 2023 from .

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Beilock, S., Gunderson, E., Ramirez, G., and Levine, S. (2010, February 2). Female teachers’ math anxiety affects girls’ math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(5) 1860-1863.
  2. Bransford, J. (1979). Human cognition. Belmont, CA. Wadsworth Publishing Company.
  3. Carrier, K.A. (2003). Improving high school English language learners’ second language listening through strategy instruction. Bilingual Research Journal, 27, 383-410.
  4. Chua, B. And Wu, Y. (2005).Designing technology-based mathematics lessons: A pedagogical framework. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 24(4), 387-402.
  5. Furnham, A., Reeves, E., and Budhani, S. (2002). Parents think their sons are brighter than their daughters: Sex differences in parental self-estimations and estimations of their children’ s multiple intelligences. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 163(1), 24-39.
  6. Gall, M.D, Borg, W.E., & Gall, J.P. (1996). Educational research. White Plains, NY: Longman.
  7. Haddock, J. (1997). Reflecting in groups: contextual and theoretical considerations within nurse education and practice. Nurse Education Today, 17, 381-385.
  8. Justice, E.M., & Dornan, T.M. (2001). Metacognitive differences between traditional-age and nontraditional-age college students. Adult Education Quarterly, 51(3), 236-249.
  9. Kazdin, A. & Mascitelli, S. (1982). Covert and overt rehearsal in homework practice in developing assertiveness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 83, 240-245.
  10. Kiewra, K., DuBois, N., Christian, D., McShane, A., Meyerhoffer,M., and Roskelley, D. (1991). Note-taking functions and techniques. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 240-245.
  11. Levin. J., Guttman, J., & Mccabe, A. (1977). Notes and comments: Distinguishing between two covert learning strategies with elementary schoolchildren. American Educational Research Journal, 14(3): 339.
  12. Polloway, E., Patton, J., & Serna, L. (2008). Strategies for teaching learners with special needs. Upper Saddle River: Pearson, Merrill, Prentice Hall.
  13. Roberts, M.J., & Erdos, G. (1993). Strategy selection and metacognition. Educational Psychology, 13, 259-266.
  14. Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
  15. Syrjala, L. (1996). The teacher as a researcher. In Eeva Hujala (Ed.) Childhood Education: International Perspectives. Finland: Association for Childhood Education International, Oulu University. ED 403 069.
  16. Smith, B. (1983). Fundamental problems in phonics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6 (1), 88-93.
  17. Taylor, J. (2008, September 22). The effects of a computerized-algebra program on mathematics achievement of college and university freshmen enrolled in a developmental mathematics course, The Free Library. Http://www.thefreelibrary.com/The effects of a computerized-algebra program on mathematics... DASHDASH

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read

Related Collections