The Effects of Virtual Coaching on Teacher Candidates’ Perceptions and Concerns Regarding On-Demand Corrective Feedback
Donna Wake, Debbie Dailey, Alicia Cotabish, Tammy Benson, University of Central Arkansas, United States
Journal of Technology and Teacher Education Volume 25, Number 3, ISSN 1059-7069 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA
** Invited as a paper from SITE 2016 ** A virtual coaching intervention utilizing Skype and Bluetooth (Bug-in-the-Ear) technology provided immediate corrective feedback to non-traditional teacher candidates during a semester-long internship experience. Participants completed their student teaching internship as a requirement of a teacher preparation program at a mid-size Southeastern university. The virtual coaching model allowed candidates in rural, remote and local, urban contexts to receive immediate guidance and feedback. This randomized field study reports participants’ observations and concerns about the virtual coaching model and examines effects on instructional behaviors of pre-service teacher candidates compared to face-to-face internship observations with delayed feedback. Specifically, the intervention included on-demand corrective feedback utilizing Skype VoIP and Bug-in-the-Ear (BIE) Bluetooth technology. Participants cited benefits and challenges of the model to their own practice, to the observer, and to their students and universally felt the BIE virtual coaching was a positive experience for them. The researchers’ findings suggest that the innovation was not disruptive and enabled participants to redirect their instructional practices and behaviors immediately.
Wake, D., Dailey, D., Cotabish, A. & Benson, T. (2017). The Effects of Virtual Coaching on Teacher Candidates’ Perceptions and Concerns Regarding On-Demand Corrective Feedback. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 25(3), 327-357. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved March 25, 2023 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/173825/.
© 2017 Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education
ReferencesView References & Citations Map
- Cotabish, A., Dailey, D., Robinson, A., & Hughes, A. (2013). The effects of a STEM intervention on elementary students’ science knowledge and skills. School Science and Mathematics, 113(5), 215-226.
- Dailey, D., & Robinson, A. (2016). Elementary teachers: Concerns about implementing a science program. School Science and Mathematics, 116(3), 139147.
- Danielson, C. (2007). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
- Fry, S.W. (2007). First-year teachers and induction support: Ups, downs, and inbetweens. The Qualitative Report, 12(2), 216–237.
- Gallo, J. & Curwood, J.S. (2010). Making research relevant: New directions. Wisconsin English Journal, 52(2), 23-25.
- Gillett, E., Cole, L., Kingsbury, L., & Zidon, M. (2007). Successful online learning in teacher education: What do teachers and students need? Teaching and Learning: The Journal of Natural Inquiry and Reflective Practice. Retrieved from http://web.mnstate.edu/colela/TOPOST.pdf. Goodwin, B. (2012). Research says new teachers face three common challenges. Educational Leadership, 69 (8), P. 84-85.
- Gustafson, B., Guilbert, S., & MacDonald, D. (2002). Beginning elementary science teachers: Developing professional knowledge during a limited mentoring experience. Research in Science Education, 32, 298-302.
- Hudson, P., Miller, S., Salzberg, C., & Morgan, R. (1994). The role of peer coaching in teacher education programs. Teacher Education and Special Education, 17, 224-235.
- Jenkins, J.M. & Veal, M.L. (2002). Preservice teachers’ PCK development during peer coaching. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 22, 49-68.
- Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1981). Transfer of training: The contribution of coaching. Journal of Education, 163, 163-172.
- Leech, N.L., & Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2008). Qualitative data analysis: A compendium of techniques for school psychology research and beyond. School Psychology Quarterly, 23, 587–604.
- Little, P.F. (2005). Peer coaching as a support to collaborative teaching. Mentoring and Tutoring, 13(1), 83-94.
- Lu, H.-L. (2010). Research on peer coaching in preservice teacher education A review of literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 748-753.
- Rock, M.L., Gregg, M., Howard, P.W., Ploessl, D.M., Maughn, S., Gable, R.A., & Zigmond, N.P. (2009). See me, hear me, coach me virtual bug-in-ear technology brings immediacy to professional development. National Staff Development Council, 30(3), 24-32.
- Rock, M.L., Schoenfeld, N., Zigmond, N., Gable, R.A., Gregg, M., Ploessi, D.M., & Salter, A. (2013). Can you skype me now? Developing teacher’s classroom management practices through virtual coaching. Beyond Behavior, Spring, 15-23.
- Scheeler, M.C., Congdon, M., & Stansbery, S. (2010). Providing immediate feedback to co-teachers through bug-in-ear technology: An effective method of peer coaching in inclusion classrooms. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 33(1), 83-96.
- Scheeler, M.C., McAfee, J.K., Ruhl, K.L., & Lee, D.L. (2006). Effects of Corrective Feedback Delivered via Wireless Technology on Preservice Teacher Performance and Student Behavior. Teacher Education
- Scheeler, M.C., Ruhl, K.L., & McAfee, J.K. (2004). Providing Performance Feedback to Teachers: A Review. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 27(4), 396-407.
- Sharplin, E.J., Stahl, G., & Kehrwald, B. (2016). “It’s about improving my practice”: The learner experience of real-time coaching. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(5), 119-135. Retrieved from http://ro.ecu.edu.au/ajte/ Vol41/iss5/8.
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounding theory methodology: An overview. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273-285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Sugar, W. & Slagtervan Tryon, P.J. (2014). Development of a virtual technology coach to support technology integration for K-12 educators. TechTrends, 58 (3), 54-62. Doi:10.1007/s11528-014-0752-7.
- Tschannen-Moren, B., & Tschannen-Moren, M. (2010). Evocative coaching: Transforming schools one conversation at a time. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Wade, W., Bohac, P., & Platt, J.S. (2013). Technology-based induction: Professional development strategies for correctional education. Journal of Correctional Education, 64 (2), 22-37.
- Wilkinson, S. (2004). Focus group research. In D. Silverman (ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method, and practice (pp. 177–199). Thousand Oaks,
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.Suggest Corrections to References
Cited ByView References & Citations Map
The Teacher Responding Tool: Scaffolding the teacher practice of responding to student ideas in mathematics classrooms
James P. Bywater, Jennifer L. Chiu, James Hong & Vidhya Sankaranarayanan
Computers & Education Vol. 139, No. 1 (October 2019) pp. 16–30
Editorial: What we learned about Technology and Teacher Education in 2017
Natasha H. Chenowith & Richard E. Ferdig, Kent State University, United States
Journal of Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 25, No. 4 (October 2017) pp. 365–375
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact email@example.com.