You are here:

The Prevalence and Quality of Empirical Research on the NETS-T 1999-2009
PROCEEDINGS

, The College at Brockport: State University of New York, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in San Diego, CA, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-78-5 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

The National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers (NETS-T) were revised in 2008, less than eight years after their initial publication. Though the constantly shifting technological landscape may necessitate such a rapid reexamination of national standards, providing peer-reviewed empirical research to support the use of those standards takes a great deal of time. This study investigated the extent to which researchers were able to report the results of studies on the effectiveness of the original NETS-T during their short lifespan. The Education Resources Information Center database only contained three empirical research articles on the NETS-T, and all three lacked specific traits of rigorous research. The issue of rapidly changing technology and slow research methods is discussed as a possible explanation for this dearth of defensible research.

Citation

Browne, J. (2010). The Prevalence and Quality of Empirical Research on the NETS-T 1999-2009. In D. Gibson & B. Dodge (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2010--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1365-1371). San Diego, CA, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved June 9, 2023 from .

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Bump, W. (2001). Using a Flexible Format to Create Constructivist Learning Environments in the Educational Computing Course. Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference Annual. Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
  2. Cardillo, D.S. (2005). Helping Teachers Embrace Standards. Learning and Leading with Technology, 33(2), 10-14.
  3. Chang, Y.M., Mullen, L., & Stuve, M. (2005). Are PDAs Pedagogically Feasible for Young Children? Examining the Age-Appropriateness of Handhelds in a Kindergarten Classroom. T.H.E. Journal, 32(8), 40.
  4. Curts, J., Tanguma, J., & Pena, C.M. (2008). Predictors of Hispanic School Teachers' Self-Efficacy in the Pedagogical Uses of Technology. Computers in the Schools, 25, 48-63.
  5. Dickinson, G.K. (2008). A Place to Stand. Library Media Connection, 26(6), 10-12.
  6. Franklin, T. (2000). Predictors of Ohio K-4 Student Competencies on the National Educational Technology Standards. Technology& Learning, 27(4), 19.
  7. International Society for Technology in Education. (2008). NETS for Teachers. Retrieved October 17, 2009, from http://www.iste.org/Content/NavigationMenu/NETS/ForTeachers/2008Standards/NETS_for_Teachers_2008.htm
  8. International Society for Technology in Education. (2000). Educational technology standards and performance indicators for all teachers. Retrieved October 17, 2009, from http://www.iste.org/Content/NavigationMenu/NETS/ForTeachers/2000Standards/NETS_for_Teachers_2000.htm
  9. Irving, K.E., & Bell, R.L. (2004). Double Visions: Educational Technology in Standards and Assessments for Science and Mathematics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(2), 255-266.
  10. Isakson, C. (2005). Caught on the Web. Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review, 71(1), 79-80.
  11. Kay, R.H. (2006). Evaluating strategies used to incorporate technology into preservice education: A review of the literature. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38, 383-408.
  12. Klecker, B.M., Lennex, L., & Lackner, K. (2003). Evaluating the Integration of Technology in a Teacher Preparation Program. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-Western Educational Research Association, Columbus, OH, October 2003.
  13. Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  14. Maxam, S. (2002). Emerging Technologies. Little Rock, AR: Delta Pi Epsilon.
  15. McCade, J.M. (2001). Technology Education and Computer Literacy. Technology Teacher, 61(2), 9-13.
  16. McNabb, M.L., Hassel, B., Steiner, L. (2000). Literacy Learning on the Net: An Exploratory Study. Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Lab.
  17. Niederhauser, D.S., & Lindstrom, D.L. (2006). Addressing the Nets for Students through Constructivist Technology Use in K-12 Classrooms. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(1), 91-128.
  18. North Central Regional Educational Lab (2004). Live Expert Webcast Projects Future of ISTE's NETS. Educational Technology News, 4(2), 2.
  19. Ozel, S., Yetkiner, Z.E., & Capraro, R.M. (2008). Technology in K-12 Mathematics Classrooms. School Science and Mathematics, 108(2), 80.
  20. Pappas, M. (2008). Standards for the 21st-Century Learner: Comparisons with NETS and State Standards. School Library Media Activities Monthly, 24(10), 19-26.
  21. Pittman, J. (2003). Preparing Teachers to Use Technology with Young Children in Classrooms. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 2003(1), 261-287.
  22. Roblyer, M.D. (2000). The National Educational Technology Standards (NETS): A Review of Definitions, Implications, and Strategies for Integrating NETS into K-12 Curriculum. International Journal of Instructional Media, 27(2), 133-46.
  23. Schoepp, K. (2004, July 1). Technology Integration Barriers in a Technology-Rich Environment: A CBAM Perspective. Online Submission, http://search.ebscohost.com.erl.lib.byu.edu
  24. Shoffner, M., & Dias, L. (2001). On-line support and portfolio assessment for NETS-T standards in preservice program at a large Southeastern university. Annual proceedings of selected research and development [and] practical papers presented at the national convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 24, Atlanta, GA.
  25. Waddoups, G.L., Wentworth, N., & Earle, R. (2004). Principles of Technology Integration and Curriculum Development: A Faculty Design Team Approach. Computers in the Schools, 21, 15-23.
  26. Weinburgh, M., Collier, S., & Rivera, M. (2003). Preparing Elementary Teachers: Infusing Technology as Recommended by the International Society for Technology in Education's National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers (NETS.T). TechTrends, 47(4), 43-46.
  27. Wentworth, N. (2007). Inquiry Learning and Technology: A Model for Teacher Education Programs. Computers in the Schools, 23, 115-129.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read

Related Collections