You are here:

The AP Descriptive Chemistry Question: Student Errors
Article

, University of Nevada Las Vegas, United States ; , University of Nebraska - Lincoln, United States

JCMST Volume 24, Number 4, ISSN 0731-9258 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

For over a decade, the authors have been involved in a design theory experiment providing software for high school students preparing for the descriptive question on the Advanced Placement (AP) Chemistry Exam. Since 1997, the software has been available as a Web site offering repeatable practice. This study describes a four-year dataset on incorrect responses trapped using the most recent interface. A descriptive analysis suggests that the most basic errors include: failing to write appropriate chemical formulas, recognizing reactive species in net ionic reactions, and recognizing weak electrolytes. The largest single group of reported errors, recognizing weak electrolytes, implies strategies for improved student performance on the AP exam. Further, the results of this study support the development of greatly enhanced feedback for future learners using the site.

Citation

Crippen, K. & Brooks, D. (2005). The AP Descriptive Chemistry Question: Student Errors. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 24(4), 357-366. Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved January 28, 2023 from .

© 2005 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Aleven, V., Stahl, E., Schworm, S., Fischer, F., & Wallace, R. (2003). Help seeking and help design in interactive learning environments. Review of Educational Research, 73, 277-320.
  2. Brooks, D. W., & Crippen, K. J. (2001). Learning diffi cult content using the Web: Strategies make a difference. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10(4), 283-285.
  3. Brooks, D. W., Schraw, G. P., & Crippen, K. J. (2005). Performance-related feedback: The hallmark of good instruction. Journal of Chemical Education, 82(4), 641-644.
  4. Brown, A. (1995). Evaluation of teaching and learning processes in a computersupported mechanical engineering course. Computers & Education, 25(1), 59-65.
  5. Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245-281. Charlesworth, P. (2000, August). WebCT@MTU: Rejuvenating general chemistry. Paper presented at the Biennial Conference on Chemical Education, Ann Arbor, MI.
  6. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9-13.
  7. Crippen, K. J., & Brooks, D. W. (2001). Teaching advanced placement descriptive chemistry: Suggestions from a testing Web site. The Chemical Educator, 6(5), 266-271.
  8. Crippen, K. J., & Brooks, D. W. (2002). An analysis of student learning at a testing Web site emphasizing descriptive chemistry. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 21(2), 183-201.
  9. Crippen, K. J., & Brooks, D. W. (2004). A descriptive analysis of a chemistry teacher’s Web site. ERIC Digest, ED481938.
  10. Crippen, K. J., Brooks, D. W., & Abuloum, A. (2000). A Web-site supporting the AP descriptive chemistry question. Journal of Chemical Education, 77, 1087-1088.
  11. Dufresne, R., Mestre, J., Hart, D. M., & Rath, K. A. (2002). The effect of Webbased homework on test performance in large enrollment introductory physics courses. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 21(3), 229-251.
  12. Foos, P. W., & Fisher, R. P. (1988). Using tests as learning opportunities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 179-183.
  13. Hall, R. J., Pilant, M. S., & Strader, R. A. (1999, March). The impact of Webbased instruction on performance in an applied statistics course. Paper presented at the International conference on Mathematics/Science Education and Technology, San Antonio, TX.
  14. Lhyle, K. C., & Kulhavy, R. W. (1987). Feedback processing and error correction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 320-322.
  15. Paull, T. A., Jacob, M. J., & Herrick, R. J. (1999, November). Automated homework in electrical engineering technology. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education symposium, West Lafayette, IN.
  16. Penn, J. H., Nedeff, V. M., & Gozdzik, G. (2000). Organic chemistry and the Internet: A Web-based approach to homework and testing using the WE_ LEARN system. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(2), 227-231.
  17. Pintrich, P. R. (1995). Understanding self-regulated learning. In P. R. Pintrich (Ed.), Understanding self-regulated learning (pp. 3-12). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  18. Pressley, M., & McCormick, C. B. (1995). Advanced educational psychology for educators, researchers, and policymakers. New York: Harper Collins.
  19. Renkl, A. (1998). Cognitive science: Learning from worked-out examples: A study on individual differences. Retrieved July 10, 2000, from http://www.
  20. Wegner, S. B., Holloway, K. C., & Garton, E. M. (1999). The effects of Internetbased instruction on student learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 3(2).

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.